Friday, September 30, 2011

Shoe Review: Brooks Pure Grit

I rarely do "shoe reviews" on here but felt compelled to do one for the Brooks Pure Grit - the trail version of the PureConnect line. I've been looking forward to getting these shoes for awhile and thanks to the Brooks ID program, was able to procure a pair yesterday. Of course, I went right out and tested them on a 10 mile run in the Santa Monica Mountains.

Pure Grit.
Right out of the box, my first impression was very favorable. The upper of the shoe was form-fitting but not uncomfortably so. It was almost as if they were custom made for my feet. The laces are rugged and built for off-roading, reminding me of the laces on my NB MT101s. Overall, it was a very solidly constructed shoe.

As I made my ascent,  I was a bit surprised by how heavy they felt. Now "heavy" is all relative but at 8.9 ounces, I felt every one of those ounces. When doing long, steady climbs the last thing I want is to notice the weight of my feet. Also, they felt a bit "foamy" on the sole - noticeably more so than my MT101s or Racer ST5's (my other two favorite trail shoes). On ascents especially, I like to be able to connect with the ground which ironically with their trail version of the "PureConnects" I wish I was able to do more of.


The Pure Grits really shined on the descent however. The padded soles really absorbed the pounding and rocks well and the "grip" of the soles were evident. I was able to rock the downhills (or about as much as I'm able to right now) without really thinking about feet protection and was instead able to focus on footing.

Overall, these are really solid trail shoes and I will definitely include them in my rotation. However, I think they will be better served for the longer stuff (20+ miles) than shorter jaunts in the dirt.

5 comments:

Nathan Leehman said...

Good comments - I'm not on the ID program (dude's! return my emails!), but I was able to get my hands on them a little early. I agree with your comments completely, but what you describe is exactly what I was looking for. There needs to be a better understanding of the difference between "minimal" shoes and "low/zero drop" and "lightweight" shoes - while I wouldn't for a second consider these the former, they are fantastic for the latter. My personal preference on short (<12 mile) trail runs is the Minimus or VFFs, depending on the day, but when I need to crank up the miles, my initial impression is that these will be a great option. To me, they feel a lot like an off-road Green Silence, which is a huge complement in my book. I'm looking forward to a bit more trail time in them , and to hearing what other folks have to say.

Mike said...

Try 'em without the insole. You might wish they were a half size smaller, but you'll get the ground feel that you're missing back.

Sarah said...

The look reminds me of the Grinch shoe of Nike, the color is just the other way around. It seems like a very solid shoe and I might get one for myself.
shoes online

Anonymous said...

Warren said ... walk 4-5 miles daily in them, and tried them once as a golf shoe, with surprisingly good results (in the Sam Snead barefoot mode) ... good shoe

Anonymous said...

I love these shoes. I was heading out to buy my second pair and wanted to check reviews again just to be sure
. They are the most comfortable shoe I've ever owned, on or off trail. Funny that someone mentioned playing golf in them because my golf shoes were hurting my feet a bit so I tried these and they were great.